Table of Contents
- What Is AB 3030?
- Key Requirements for Physicians and Healthcare Facilities
- Why This Matters for CIOs and IT Leaders
- 1. Infrastructure & Implementation
- 2. Governance and Policy
- 3. Data Privacy and Security
- 4. Business Continuity and Risk Management
- Potential Expansion to Other States and Industries
- Preparing Now for the Future
Do not index
Do not index
If you’re in the healthcare industry—or oversee IT strategy within it—California’s newly enacted Assembly Bill 3030 (“AB 3030”) is about to become a critical piece of legislation to understand. While it doesn’t take effect until January 1, 2025, it’s never too early to prepare for the new rules around using Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI) in patient communications. Below is an overview of AB 3030, what it means for healthcare providers, and why it should be on the radar of CIOs and other IT leaders.
What Is AB 3030?
AB 3030 is a California law that requires health facilities, clinics, or physician offices (including group practices) to notify patients when Generative AI is used to create or communicate patient clinical information. In other words, if you use an AI-powered tool to generate or convey text, audio, or video that provides clinical information to a patient, you have a legal obligation to ensure the patient is aware that the content was produced by AI.
Notably, the notification requirement is waived if the AI-generated content is reviewed and approved by a licensed or certified human healthcare provider prior to being communicated to the patient. This carve-out implies that if a qualified professional vets and signs off on the AI-produced message, it is treated as though the message is coming from that professional—so no additional patient notification is required.
Key Requirements for Physicians and Healthcare Facilities
Under AB 3030, if an AI tool is used without that human review and approval step, providers must:
- Prominently Display or Announce an AI Notice
- For written communications (letters, emails, online chat, etc.), a statement indicating “this information was generated by AI” must appear at the start of each communication.
- For continuous online communications (like chat-based interactions), the notice has to remain prominently displayed throughout the interaction.
- For audio communications (voicemails or phone calls), the notice must be given verbally at the beginning and end of the interaction.
- For video communications, the notice must be visibly displayed throughout the interaction.
- Provide Clear Contact Instructions
Patients must be told how to contact a human healthcare provider, staff member, or other relevant professional if they have any questions or concerns regarding the AI-generated information.
- Compliance and Documentation
To demonstrate compliance, healthcare organizations will likely need to ensure these notices are documented—particularly for digital communications and any situation where the AI content is presented directly to the patient.
Why This Matters for CIOs and IT Leaders
1. Infrastructure & Implementation
CIOs and IT departments are typically responsible for vetting, implementing, and maintaining technology solutions—including those that incorporate Generative AI. Because AB 3030 demands that certain notifications be present when AI-generated clinical content is used, IT systems must be able to insert or display these notices automatically. This may require:
- Software Integrations that detect AI-generated messages and append disclaimers.
- User Interface Modifications in patient portals, chat systems, or telemedicine platforms to display real-time notices.
- Audit Trails and Logging to prove compliance should there be any dispute.
2. Governance and Policy
CIOs will also need to collaborate with compliance, legal, and clinical teams to create internal policies governing when and how AI is used. For instance:
- Defining the threshold at which content is considered “AI-generated” rather than “AI-assisted.”
- Establishing review protocols for AI-generated content that will exempt the organization from mandatory patient notices (i.e., a licensed provider signs off on the AI draft).
- Implementing employee training so staff know how to handle AI-generated patient communications.
3. Data Privacy and Security
Generative AI systems often rely on large volumes of data, including potentially sensitive patient information. As a CIO:
- You must ensure HIPAA compliance (or any equivalent state-level data privacy laws) when feeding data into AI models.
- You may need to implement secure on-premises or specialized cloud solutions for AI to avoid exposing protected health information (PHI) to third-party data processing.
4. Business Continuity and Risk Management
From a risk management perspective, non-compliance with AB 3030’s notification requirements could lead to regulatory scrutiny, fines, or damage to brand reputation. CIOs and IT staff should plan for:
- Contingency Workflows if an AI system becomes unavailable or experiences errors—particularly if you rely heavily on AI-generated communications.
- Fallback or “Human-in-the-Loop” review processes to mitigate mistakes made by the AI system.
Potential Expansion to Other States and Industries
California is often at the forefront of tech-related legislation, from privacy (CCPA/CPRA) to AI governance. It’s not far-fetched to anticipate:
- Adoption by Other States
As AI becomes increasingly prevalent in healthcare, other states may copy or adapt AB 3030’s approach to AI disclosure. Much like California’s privacy laws influenced other jurisdictions, a wave of similar AI regulations could follow.
- Broader Application Across Businesses
While AB 3030 targets healthcare, the idea of “AI disclosure” can apply to any industry where AI-generated communications significantly impact consumer decisions or well-being. Financial services, legal services, and educational platforms—any scenario in which a company provides critical, individualized advice—could eventually require AI usage disclosures by law.
- AI Audits and Transparency
Businesses beyond healthcare may be asked (or mandated) to perform periodic AI audits to ensure fairness, accuracy, and transparency in their AI-driven services. Not only might disclaimers be necessary, but explainability of how AI arrived at conclusions could soon be demanded by regulators and consumers alike.
Preparing Now for the Future
AB 3030’s effective date of January 1, 2025 gives organizations a narrow but reasonable window to get their AI governance in order. For CIOs, this translates to:
- Assessing Current AI Use
Make a comprehensive list of where AI is used to generate or facilitate patient communications.
- Implementing Notification Logic
Ensure that software systems can auto-tag, label, or verbally disclose AI-generated content where required.
- Establishing “Human-in-the-Loop”
Decide in which scenarios a human reviewer will step in. This might allow you to avoid mandatory AI notices—while still benefiting from AI’s efficiencies.
- Training and Communication
Coordinate training sessions for clinicians, administrative staff, and IT teams to help them understand both the benefits and the risks of AI in healthcare.
Though AB 3030 centers on healthcare, it signals a broader regulatory trend: lawmakers and the public expect transparency around the use of advanced AI tools. Organizations that prepare now—by building robust AI policies, automating notification processes, and refining security and compliance strategies—will be well-positioned to adapt as these laws inevitably expand to more states and potentially more industries.
Written by
A decade of experience in system administration, vulnerability management, and digital security.